The Unforeseen Connections, Unraveling the Puzzling Chain of Events in the U.S Political Landscape
The Potential Threat to American Stability: The Kamala Harris Presidency
The American political landscape has been a roller coaster of significant and interconnected events. The Trump assassination attempt, the Republican National Convention (RNC) endorsing JD Vance as Vice President, Joe Biden refraining from seeking reelection, and Kamala Harris's seemingly calculated “coronation”—are these just mere coincidences? These are pivotal moments that demand attention and deeper examination.
The recent shocking attempt on former President Trump’s life has set the political cauldron ablaze, leaving a trail of unanswered questions. The timing of the attempt remains suspicious, especially after another democratic lawfare failure. Could this be an unusual means of diverting attention or disturbing the political equilibrium? The United States Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle has added to the mystery because of her lack of transparency. Her continual evasion of questions on July 22, 2024, deepened the intrigue. She should have been fired immediately, but true to the Biden form that did not happen. Fortunately, she resigned, but instead of being silent, Biden lauds her in a memo. Did he forget that an innocent person was killed? This memo is a slap in the face of the Corey Comperatore family. Her resignation should not stop or slow down the uncovering of what happened at the rally, and she must be held accountable.
Following this unsettling episode, former President Trump selected JD Vance as the Vice President nominee at the RNC Convention. The convention was highly successful; however, with all the follow-on events, the attempted assassination and convention now seem light years away.
Not long after the RNC Convention, President Biden decided not to seek re-election. This was an enormous surprise for many, but I doubt it was a surprise for everyone. My guess is that he was forced out; the Democrats seem to have no problem eating their own, and one can only wonder what went on behind the scenes that led him to this decision. His decision appeared to baffle many: was it merely to give a clear run to his vice president Kamala Harris, or was it to suck the headwinds from the RNC Convention? Could this have been the goal that the Democrats were trying to achieve? The lack of transparency in all issues makes us wonder.
As expected, the Vice President seized the moment as Biden's exit saw her "coronation," an ascension that seemed mapped out in detail. Her smooth transition raises questions: was this a calculated move from the Democratic Party? It appears that she already has enough delegates to gain the nomination. As Democrats circle the wagons around Harris, all but a few are giving glowing accounts of her ability to lead, and the mainstream media will dutifully follow suit.
Keep in mind that Harris has been lying to us since inauguration day, as Biden’s health and cognitive issues deteriorated. One can only ask who has been running the country. Who will run it for the remainder of Biden’s term?
In this fast-paced and unpredictable journey, questionable events are closely intertwined. Undeniably, the situation reminds us of Shakespeare’s famous quote, “All the world's a stage.” We wonder whether the actors merely played their parts as scripted. It is difficult not to question the fortuitous nature of these events, as skepticism about their timing remains justifiable.
With Harris as the presumptive nominee, it is essential to note that the puppeteer is the same; only the puppet will change.
At the very least, the possible Kamala Harris presidency is concerning; it worsens after that. Her trajectory from senator to Vice President and potentially ascending to the highest office in the land has raised many eyebrows, inciting concerns about how such a shift could potentially reshape the American political landscape. The crux of concerns stems from her lack of accomplishment in the Senate, economic policies, border control, criminal justice reform, her stance on healthcare, and the new Green Deal.
Her economic policy proposals will undoubtedly be ambitious but will undoubtedly have severe ramifications. While she claims to uplift the poor and middle classes, the reality of her approach is gravely flawed. Harris supports broad-brush policies like a $15 federal minimum wage and a significant tax increase on the wealthy. Do not be surprised if ordinary American citizens are deemed wealthy. Besides the direct negative impact on job creators and the economy, increased taxes are historically linked with reduced economic output, curtailed investments, and job losses - imperatives the American economy can hardly afford. Her heavy-handed approach to wealth redistribution will inadvertently stifle the capitalist backbone of the U.S. economy.
As the border czar, she has done nothing, not even a serious border visit. If Harris is elected, one can expect no change to the current conditions. I am sure you will hear how vital border security is while campaigning, but that will be window-dressing.
Harris's stance on criminal justice reform, dogged by years of criticism for her record as California's Attorney General, is another sore point. Critics declare that Harris’ tenure was marked by excessive penalties and mass incarceration, a legacy at odds with her publicly progressive image.
Healthcare. As a Senator, she zig-zagged her position on healthcare–from supporting 'Medicare for All' to advocating for a more moderate approach, causing critics to fear her shift towards socialist-style healthcare. The implementation of 'Medicare for All' would potentially bankrupt the country and reduce the quality of healthcare services, pushing already strained resources to breaking points.
Green New Deal. Senator Harris was an early supporter. Although we desire good, cheap, and clean energy, we do not want it at the cost of our economy. Make no mistake, she is radical on this subject, proposing Net Zero by 2030
A possible Kamala Harris presidency threatens to turn the American landscape on its head—from economics and criminal justice to healthcare. And let us not forget that she has virtually no foreign policy experience. The danger lies not in change but rather in the change that could portend an unstable future for America.
As time unfolds, the larger picture will undoubtedly come into focus, disclosing whether the instances that brought us today are merely strange coincidences or well-choreographed political maneuvers. American democracy is at a crucial juncture, and the world is waiting for the next act in this political drama.